Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
advertisement
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit agio's column >>

AGIO

The law of chaos is the law of ideas, of improvisations and of seasons of belief.
Articles Posted: 49  Links Seeded: 316
Member Since: 11/2006  Last Seen: 4/19/2011

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Poll: Majority Of Republicans Think ACORN Stole the 2008 Election

Seeded on Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:48 PM EST
Read ArticleArticle Source: Talking Points Memo
politics, barack-obama, republicans, gop, tea-party, 2008-election, doug-hoffman
Seeded by agio
advertisement

The new national poll from Public Policy Polling (D) has an astonishing number about paranoia among the GOP base: Republicans do not think President Obama actually won the 2008 election -- instead, ACORN stole it.

My comments on what happened in thread #1 are here.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • agio's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Centervine, Left of Center, ObamaExpress, ObamaVine, The Big 2008 Election
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (248)
Jump to discussion page: 1 2
agio

Obama's margin of victory in the popular vote was around 9.5 million votes. That's a lot of fraudulent ballots, if you really believe the election was rigged.

  • 57 votes
#1 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:49 PM EST
Arlene Tognetti

Taking the quote from the above article:

Republicans do not think President Obama actually won the 2008 election -- instead, ACORN stole it.

I would say the Republicans are talking about themselves, their own guilt

about the 2000 and 2004 elections...GW BUSH and CHENEY...the most revealing

thing about anyone is when they accuse or blame others of the very thing they have done.

Truth speaks!

Good article

  • 53 votes
#1.1 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:05 PM EST
Lola-984242

Republicans do not think President Obama actually won the 2008 election -- instead, ACORN stole it.

My question to that statement would be, how exactly????

  • 42 votes
#1.2 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:52 PM EST
Luke WrightRestored

Obama's margin of victory in the popular vote was around 9.5 million votes. That's a lot of fraudulent ballots, if you really believe the election was rigged.

Or it could be that a year after the election I still haven't met anybody who actually voted for Obama! Hmmm, I wonder if that is because the election really was rigged or if people are alreadt too ashamed to admit voting for such a @!$%# stain?

  • 5 votes
#1.3 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:01 PM EST
Michael Ambler

Reported for obvious reasons.

  • 11 votes
#1.4 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:02 PM EST
fuhgetabotit

Or it could be that a year after the election I still haven't met anybody who actually voted for Obama! Hmmm

They crack me up, they really do. Ignorance and lies, is there anything else, anything at all the right has to say that isn't outright ignorance or lies?

  • 33 votes
#1.5 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:04 PM EST
agio

Luke, if you want to repost your comment in a more respectful manner I would appreciate it.

  • 13 votes
#1.6 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:06 PM EST
Luke WrightRestored

Luke, if you want to repost your comment in a more respectful manner I would appreciate it.

#1.3 did not violate the CoH. You cannot remove a post just because you do not agree with it! If you don't happen to think Obama is a @!$%# stain then that's just fine, but I DO and that is not a violation of CoH!!!

  • 9 votes
#1.7 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:19 PM EST
agio

CoH 1: "Above all else, respect others." Calling the President what you did violates this pretty flagrantly, and is blatantly inflammatory.

Repost the content without the nastiness and I'd be more than happy to let it stand.

  • 31 votes
#1.8 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:22 PM EST
tweetheart44

Wow....what a surprise! The notion that Acorn stole the election is PURE RUBBISH! The Republicans did themselves in, especially McCain for choosing such a stupid person (Palin) as a running mate. People voted for President Obama because they were ready for something other than another war monger, like Bush, in office. If the Republicans want to see who is responsible for their loss, all they need to do is look at THEMSELVES!

  • 29 votes
#1.9 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:23 PM EST
Bluekilgoretrout

Indeed.

If you want the culprit of this theft, look no further than McCain/Palin.

When you nominate a pair of jackasses, the result is often negative.

Bush being the glaring exception to this rule.

  • 18 votes
#1.10 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:28 PM EST
Luke WrightRestored

CoH 1: "Above all else, respect others." Calling the President what you did violates this pretty flagrantly, and is blatantly inflammatory.

Sorry but CoH only applies to those ON NEWSVINE! I can call the sorry assed President anything I want to. It's MY OPINION and it's not a CoH violation. I suggest you read the CoH again for you own edification!

  • 7 votes
#1.11 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:29 PM EST
Bluekilgoretrout

Luke:

Despite the COH, you are rather belligerent and continually rely on braun rather than brain.

And no, I didn't just call you stupid, which would clearly be a violation of the COH.

By the way freedom of speech really doesn't apply here.

  • 20 votes
#1.12 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:36 PM EST
agio

Take it up with a moderator, if you wish. AFAIAC your comment the way it was phrased is flame bait, and doesn't contribute to the discussion in a constructive manner.

Like I said if you want to repost without the nastiness be my guest.

  • 23 votes
#1.13 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:38 PM EST
cjn-718250

Yeh, right Acorn took the election!! Just like Bush didn't in '04 with the dipsh*t from Sarasota verifying the ballots in FL.
Is the GOP getting more stupid or is it just my wishful thinking. Duhhhhhhhh!!!!!

  • 15 votes
#1.14 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:50 PM EST
Catch22

Sorry but CoH only applies to those ON NEWSVINE!

You are on Newsvine. Go ahead and read it again, there is nothing in the code saying it only applies to direct attacks specifically aimed at particular people on Newsvine - I have seen plenty who pretend it does.

It does expressly prohibit harrassment of others on Newsvine, none of the other provisions are so limited.

  • 8 votes
#1.15 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:13 PM EST
Mike Rupert

lmao the majority of Republicans. Which only shows the majority of Republicans are not informed.

  • 18 votes
#1.16 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:28 PM EST
Louie Lou

Republicans do not think President Obama actually won the 2008 election -- instead, ACORN stole it.


Of course they do. They're sore losers!

  • 20 votes
#1.17 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:53 PM EST
Independent Ed

Of course it was stolen. Since when is anything that goes wrong the fault of Republicans?

  • 19 votes
#1.18 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:03 PM EST
JoulesBeef

they are going through the bush complaint list and using every one of them on obama.,
it's part of the bush legacy project to make the strife just look partisan in nature rather than the fact that he sucked as a president.

anyways most republicans think kenya stole the election for their machurian candidate that was trained at 5 year old for all this.

  • 11 votes
#1.19 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:06 PM EST
Bubba-939441

Republicans lost because Republicans didn't vote. There was no candidate for conservatives. Yes, it is their own fault for running such liberal candidates.

  • 7 votes
#1.20 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:12 PM EST
Catch22

I suspect that the number on this particular poll may not be reliable. With a phone poll those who opts to participate skews the results and it may reflect more anger than actual rational belief. Many were probably just pushing buttons.

While I doubt a majority of Republican literally believe that ACORN stole the election, there are way too many who believe on the basis of rumor and innuendo that his Presidency is somehow not legitimate whether because of ACORN or the birther movement.

Part of the problem is the ongoing polarization and the tendency to ignore information that doesnt fit with what they already believe or want to believe.

See also Rumors in an Age of Unreason

  • 7 votes
#1.21 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:13 PM EST
agio

You might be right to question the accuracy of the poll, and 52% is a slim majority. But even if it were only 25% who believe that somehow ACORN managed to slip 9.5 million bogus ballots into the count... well, that just makes you go, "hmmm..."

  • 14 votes
#1.22 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:16 PM EST
AZPADDY

That Republicans believe ACORN stole the election should be no surprise. They also believe less regulation is the way out of this financial mess the previous administration led the way to....with less regulation.

Take a look at their other beliefs. Ask Sarah Palin her beliefs if you'd like some belly laughs.

  • 18 votes
#1.23 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:20 PM EST
deccles02

The only election that was truly rigged was the 2000 election. If any of these people in this poll actually supported the laws of the country, they would have been protesting the results of that election too.

Hypocrits.

  • 19 votes
#1.24 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 6:17 PM EST
Krankee

Cattle herd follows the cow bell. MMMOOOOOOOOGOPOOOOOOO

  • 8 votes
#1.25 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:06 PM EST
Krankee

JoulesBeef said:

....rather than the fact that he sucked as a president.

A little krankee today JB? :)

  • 2 votes
#1.26 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:08 PM EST
A. Macarthur

Yeah! And they're still waiting in line in Ohio to cast their votes for John Kerry ... and did you know ...

The wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said that she was working at a conservative research group gathering résumés for appointments in a possible Bush administration but that she saw no conflict between her job and her husband's deliberations on a case that could decide the presidency.

The comments from the justice's wife, Virginia Lamp Thomas, a former Republican Congressional aide, came as a federal judge in Nashville said Justice Thomas faced a serious conflict of interest as a result of his wife's work for the Heritage Foundation.

Tell all you right-wing hypocrites what I'll do. I will agree to an investigation regarding the stealing of the 2008 election by ACORN, if YOU WILL AGREE TO AN INVESTIGATION INTO ALLEGED WAR CRIMES AND VARIOUS CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS BY THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION.

Who's in?

A. Mac

  • 25 votes
#1.27 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:11 PM EST
Lonnie-1003775

Id disagree with acorn stealing anything. . . but taxpayer money . . . . . . He won by this 'change' crap he was pushing. . . . . . well the change is the color of his skin. . . its just politics as usual in d.c. . . . . .

  • 2 votes
#1.28 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:03 PM EST
jaywow67

Majority of republicans think the moon walk was staged. That Lord Christ was a white man. That aliens landed at Roswell. That Limbaugh is king and Beck is his Chamberpot. That green cards are used at National Rentals. That McConnell knows what he is talking about. That Palin is the President.

  • 11 votes
#1.29 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:26 PM EST
ExThumper

No it's true. Acorn forced me to vote for Obama.

  • 6 votes
#1.30 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:28 PM EST
tyler

AFAIAC your comment the way it was phrased is flame bait, and doesn't contribute to the discussion in a constructive manner.

Wasn't your original justification, though, agio. 1.3, 1.7, 1.11 restored, they don't violate #1 of the CoH. 'Respect others' refers to other Viners, not public figures [especially not The Most Famous Man Alive (TM)].

If you want to prohibit personal anecdotes on your discussions, you can, but you'll have to do it consistently, and it's a staple of internet discussion.

Mind #4 of the Code of Honor.

Be responsible for the content you submit and exercise impartiality when deleting comments and reporting abuse.

  • 6 votes
#1.31 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:28 AM EST
agio

Only 1 comment was deleted by me. It had nothing to do with personal anecdotes. Apparently calling the President a "@!$%#stain" is acceptable on Newsvine. Live and learn.

  • 8 votes
#1.32 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:37 AM EST
AZPADDY

agio

I've come to realize that certain political views are accepted on Newsvine and others are not, along with turning a blind eye towards some privacy violations.

living and still learning.....

  • 4 votes
#1.33 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 10:27 AM EST
katiekay-543258

I think calling anyone a '@!$%#stain' is horrible; especially the President of the US. Whether people like him or not; he deserves respect. I'm with you Agio; I marked it as 'inflamatory'.

  • 9 votes
#1.34 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 10:56 AM EST
Catch22

tyler,

I appreciate the difficulty of the job, and that these comments may not be sufficiently outrageous in your opinion, but I think you too narrowly describe the honor code, and thereby invite inflamatory and comments of no value that circumvent your description of the code of honor by not expressly being applied to a specific person on newsvine.

'Respect others' refers to other Viners

Thats not what it says in the honor code - it does not limit it only to other viners nor does it show respect to other viners to have overly inflamatory comments even if they do not expressly specify a particular individual on newvine.

Above all else, respect others. Address issues and arguments and refrain from making personal attacks. If you see something disrespectful or inappropriate, report it - rather than further inflaming the situation. More +

a. Adding a personal attack to an otherwise valuable comment or article serves only to render that contribution invalid in its entirety. Such content is subject to moderation.

b. Harassment and/or intimidation of others on Newsvine will not be tolerated, and patterns of such behavior may result in account cancelation.

Harrassment is limited to others. I dont disagree that respecting others on newsvine isnt more important and that public figures are open to a lot of flack but do things like "@!$%# stain" :

1. Adds nothing of value.
2. Is clearly inflammatory

Why are these reportable then if they dont violate the code of honor unless addressed to a specific newsviner.

Now whether or not you judge these comments as flagarant enough violation to warrant deletion is one thing, but to claim that the honor code has absolutely no bearing is a mistake in my humble opinion and invites more shouting and insuliting without actually specifying another individual on newsvine.

So Obama is a @!$%# stain is ok.
How about right wingers/liberals are @!$%# stains?
How about everyone who voted for Obama/Bush are @!$%# stains?
People like Rush LImbaugh are @!$%# stains?
People who like X are @!$%# stains?

  • 5 votes
#1.35 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:01 AM EST
agio

Catch22, I appreciate you taking the time to explore this issue further, though I have my doubts whether Tyler will respond, or even take the time to follow up.

What annoys me about this whole thing is that I feel I was very clear about why I deleted the comment, and even encouraged the original poster to repost the substance of his post without the bit that I considered to be inflammatory. Why Tyler thought it had anything to do with "anecdotes", or that I somehow changed my justification for deleting the comment, is completely beyond me.

In other words I was doing my best to keep the discourse civil in my seed. And I get rewarded for trying to be diligent with a lecture on the CoH. The poster gets rewarded for being disruptive by having Newsvine staff intervene on his behalf.

It's things like this that make me feel like participating in Newsvine is no longer worth my time.

  • 5 votes
#1.36 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:51 AM EST
AZPADDY

I've been there too, agio.

However, Newsvine is somewhat addictive, because it's one forum where we as progressives can debate head to head with conservatives without a moderator leaning so far to the right due to being beaten into submission by the conservative mantra of "MSM liberal bias".

In my opinion, Tyler has demonstrated a definate bias, but what the hell......ignore it, and let's keep giving the wrongheaded contrivatives the crap they deserve. After all, they're @!%&* stains!!

  • 4 votes
#1.37 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:42 PM EST
Catch22

Tyler has demonstrated a definate bias,

If you mean political bias, based upon my (albeit limited) experience I have to disagree about that - there is a lot of grey in deciding whether to uphold moderation and I know Tyler has been accused of bias the other way as well.

  • 3 votes
#1.38 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:58 PM EST
agio

I don't know about bias but I don't think in this case he looked very carefully at the thread before making his decision.

Whatever. Calling someone a @!$%# stain is ok with Newsvine, duly noted. I'm done worrying about this.

  • 2 votes
#1.39 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:14 PM EST
RV in GB#1

Tyler,

I think that you've done an admiral job. You have been consistent in your punishment.

agio,

You should see what people call President Bush ALL THE TIME on Newsvine (and in many cases it is/was deserved.) Tyler is being fair and consistent. "Calling someone a @!$%# stain is ok with Newsvine" is not entirely a true statement (you cannot direct it at someone PERSONALLY.) If you are offended by it, substitute the word "Love" - oh wait, that doesn't exactly work in this case either.

You (and the others who are attacking Tyler) need to recognize the difficulty of Tyler's position, and respect it.

  • 2 votes
#1.40 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 4:12 PM EST
agioDeleted
agio

RV in GB#1,

Thanks for your comment. I disagree with Tyler's decision, but It is what it is.

  • 2 votes
#1.42 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:29 PM EST
Reply
John-614398

Well it would not surprise me if it was tried and I'm sure there was a lot of fraud. But there is one thing that will convince you that it did not happen. Just watch a video of the woman who runs Acorn.

You will then know she is not that smart.

  • 4 votes
Reply#2 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:04 PM EST
professorwoland

Why would ACORN steal the election for Democrats when Republicans have given them grants and regularly spoken at ACORN events? (e.g. John McCain)

  • 28 votes
#2.1 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:44 PM EST
bonos_rama

Good point, professor. Maybe Acorn DID steal the election - the 2000 or the 2004 election!!!!

  • 24 votes
#2.2 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:58 PM EST
AZPADDY

The only thing ACORN has ever done is to register voters that the G.O.P. ignored and discounted as unimportant. That these voters vote 98% Democrat should be expected. Fraud? Corruption?......right. The G.O.P. just hates ACORN because they paid attention to the segment of society that the G.O.P. exploits.

End of story.

  • 12 votes
#2.3 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 10:33 AM EST
Reply
charnello

Who started this dumb idea? GEEZ

Whoever puts this forth as a legitimate reason for more waterloo garbage needs to be put on a national ignore list.

  • 15 votes
Reply#3 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:25 PM EST
Bill Pitcher

I see stupid people Walking around like regular people. They don't see each other. They only see what they want to see. They don't know they're stupid.

I see them All the time. They're everywhere.

  • 17 votes
#3.1 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:35 PM EST
fuhgetabotit

The report outlining the alternate universe of the Republican conservative, aka 'real' Americans, aka claims to be christian but it isn't, it is nothing but religious bigotry and fundamentalism in church crazy pants of the average, everyday, right wing flogger and the teabaggers in charge of their media and the cowardly panderers in the GOP...

Its a good read, goes a long way to explaining this kind of thing and why the majority of the GOP are birthers through and through. We should all read it as these political whacktards are actually quite serious and armed to the teeth and worse, firmly believe the corrupted ignorance and vile Anti-Christian UN-American crap coming from Fox, Limbaugh, Palin, Boehner, Bachmann etc etc and are likely to do damn near anything, and that includes some pretty bad stuff, to get their deviant perverted church crazy ugliness and total horse@!$%# back on top.

Thankfully the GOP is down to just 20% of us. So what we are really saying here is that out of the smallest minority party, given that both the independants and the democrats seem to outnumber them, just over half of them, 1 in 10 of us, are stupid beyond belief, and likely dangerous as hell.

But we knew this, 56% of them accept that Obama is not our real president and has no American Birth certificate. 56% of them cherish that thought as truth and it gives them hope yet of seeing him prayed to death or that somehow, miraculously we assume, the rest of the country, us, the minority according to them, haha, comes to our senses and realizes what a great president Palin will be, right after we accept their version of the lord I'm sure.

The remaining GOP, conservatism, the right in America, the base... It is insane, gone, lost, minds are broken, fanatical, hostile pissed off about who knows what exactly, and of no reasonable use to us as a country. And dangerous as hell.

Give them up, let them wander into a political isolation asylum as the largest ideological fringe party since the confederacy as they wear themselves hoarse with their repulsive deluded and criminally irresponsible short bus platform to return us to a dark ages mentality of religion and in all likely-hood, finish the job they started 9 years ago, and destroy the country.

Lets start the third party bandwagon. The democrats and Obama can putter along just fine for an election cycle or two here. There is more then enough work to keep them busy. And in the meantime we can throw around ideas for a new party that doesn't include racism, bigotry, religious hysteria and political insanity and who knows...

Freed from that pit full of sticky ideological goopoo, something better comes about.

God knows anything that is determined to stay in that pit, the ideological hell-hole of the 'right' in America, and be aligned with whats in there deserves the same scorn, and political death, that the Republican party is working so hard to accomplish for itself.

Ideological suicide by stupidity, pandering, demagogue and mob.

Its uglier then I could have imagined.

  • 17 votes
#3.2 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:31 PM EST
pcbynature

fugh

New article that touches on this

  • 3 votes
#3.3 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:34 PM EST
pcbynature

bill

LOL. That kinda scary!

Dave

  • 3 votes
#3.4 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:35 PM EST
marcowhm

Who started this dumb idea?

Republicans have been regurgitating the same sound bytes since the campaigns began. In the majority of conversations I have had, I keep hearing the same crap over and over, like "ACORN, socialist, Hitler, death panels" and more. I have just about given up trying to have an intelligent debate with people I know personally who have opposing views.

  • 17 votes
#3.5 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:06 PM EST
bondibox

Ya think Fox News' incessant mongering of the ACORN story has anything to do with the poll results? They are purposely undermining his credibility in any way they can.

  • 11 votes
#3.6 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:36 PM EST
Todd-511903

Let the Republicans believe that ACORN is the cause of all their problems. Their devotion to fringe non-issues will allow the Democrats to win by default.

  • 14 votes
#3.7 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:32 PM EST
Reply
JoMan

I guess that's fair. I feel both of Bush's elections were stolen. Stings doesn't is?

Like one person said, the lady that runs Acorn is sure not that smart, and Bush had a lot more criminals working for him to make the chances of him stealing 2000 and 2004 a reality.

I agree with Arlene. I guess a guilty conscience would lead them to this sort of conclusion.

  • 21 votes
Reply#4 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:52 PM EST
trm2008

JoMan-ACORN must have stole the election. Our country would NEVER have elected a man like Obama!

  • 9 votes
#4.1 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:05 PM EST
JoMan

trm - Totally. With his credentials and hard work who would have fallen for it.

But let's see what did I see typed above, it wasn't only ACORN's fault:

Obama, with the help of the media, fooled enough people to vote for him.

We were fooled! We should have listened to Palin - Obama was tricksy he was.

Maybe next time we can vote for someone honorable like Cheney, or Rove... Someone hard working like Bush. (holy cow, it's even hard to type that as a joke, I have to go wash my hands)

  • 13 votes
#4.2 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:53 PM EST
trm2008

Or someone really smart and mavericky.

  • 12 votes
#4.3 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:00 PM EST
Reply
DJ-867199Deleted
GaryColumbus

The majority of me tinks all conservatives aire stupid critters.

  • 14 votes
Reply#6 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:59 PM EST
trm2008

Morons.

  • 8 votes
#6.1 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:05 PM EST
GaryColumbus

Exactly!

Wha-chu said.

  • 3 votes
#6.2 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:58 PM EST
David Boddie

Okay now, let's bring it back from the brink...

  • 3 votes
#6.3 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:32 PM EST
NC Obama Supporter

The majority of me tinks all conservatives aire stupid critters.

I wouldn't say stupid - a lot of them are out of touch. I especially love the young conservatives whose dads put them through college and paid half their bills through age 27. It's those guys who really have all the simple answers. Want to beat poverty? Just get a better job. In debt? Just pay it off. Want a better job? Just go to college.

  • 10 votes
#6.4 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:40 PM EST
GaryColumbus

Y'all know I'm just trying to put a lighter side to the e-question.

Wanna be in debt and not be able to get a job to pay for it? Go to college. And watch out for the girls looking for the MRS degree cause the groom used to pick up their college tab. Although with women getting the better jobs these days, men should go to college. Pay backs!:)

At the same time, young collegiate Republicans are getting harder to find. Most college students are liberal no matter where you're going or from.

  • 4 votes
#6.5 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:48 PM EST
NC Obama Supporter

Wanna be in debt and not be able to get a job to pay for it? Go to college.

This is good advice. Unfortunately, it needs to be received by 15-year-olds from their parents and we can't really blame people that much for growing up to be poor if they were never taught how to succeed when they had the chance.

  • 2 votes
#6.6 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:29 PM EST
Reply
Scotty-1083859Restored

I'm a Republican and I am very concerned about ACORN and the cheating that the Democrat Party does through it.
While I know that ACORN cheats and is guilty of chalking up thousands of illegitimate votes for Obama in 2008, I doubt that they were able to move the vote so much that their illegal activities made the difference for a win. I think that Obama, with the help of the media, fooled enough people to vote for him.
I live in Minnesota. Our Secretary of State is Mark Ritchie, a member of ACORN with ties to the Communist Party. I believe that Ritchie worked with ACORN in stealing the U.S. Senate recount. A local television station did a special investigation on how the Absentee Ballots were counted and found "inconsistencies" that Ritchie couldn't deny.
Mr. Ritchie did not present himself well before the t.v. cameras. We're going to toast that SOB next year.

I don't have a crystal ball, but I think there is growing reason to believe that there will be a Republican resurgence next year, due in part to ACORN's connections to the Democratic Party. Check out Politico's story of yesterday over how concerned leading Democrats are over the massive erosion of independent voters from their party of lies.

When Minnesota regains its State Congressional majorities, job number one will be deep voter reforms in order to stop the Stupid Party from stealing our country again.

  • 1 vote
#7 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:06 PM EST
professorwoland

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ9wy2MI1NI

  • 3 votes
#7.1 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:18 PM EST
Rita-900543

Scotty; I appreciate you post. You do know however, that you are now a target for ridicule. I agree with you, both ACORN and SEIU are communist created organizations and what's worse, our president has been involved with these people since his college days. Now the visitor most often to the WH is from SEIU. Obama said himself, that he would consult with SEIU members before creating his Healthcare Reform. What are the people of this country that are anything other than liberals to think. First we have Van Jones, now the head of SEIU visiting the WH 23 times in 9 months. Why would we want a Healthcare bill that has any connections what-so-ever to do with a communisht organization? Even if Obama is the very opposite from what his critics claim......why would he surround himself with these kind of people. He said he would stop the influence of Special Interest Groups, and Unions in government.....yet, look who his friends are.

  • 2 votes
#7.2 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:21 PM EST
Buckeye Voter

I know that ACORN cheats and is guilty of chalking up thousands of illegitimate votes for Obama in 2008...

Have proof that ACORN was guilty of even one illegitimate vote cast for Obama? Just one.

Our Secretary of State is Mark Ritchie, a member of ACORN with ties to the Communist Party.

Busy man.

A local television station did a special investigation on how the Absentee Ballots were counted and found "inconsistencies" that Ritchie couldn't deny.

I'm from Ohio. I know that a Secretary of State can taint an election. ACORN, not so much.

  • 22 votes
#7.3 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:23 PM EST
Lola-984242

While I know that ACORN cheats and is guilty of chalking up thousands of illegitimate votes

Do you have any sources for that comment Scotty? Because what I have is it was voter registration fraud, not voter fraud. Mickey Mouse who was registered by some lazy ACORN worker never voted.

ACORN's connections to the Democratic Party.

You do realize ACORN has a strong connection with the Republican party, right? Specifically a connection with Senator John McCain.

http://www.politicalaffairs.net/article/articleview/7562/1/352

Stupid Party from stealing our country again.

I'm with you there, I never want the Republicans to steal our country again.

  • 27 votes
#7.4 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:25 PM EST
trm2008

While I know that ACORN cheats and is guilty of chalking up thousands of illegitimate votes for Obama in 2008

Totally unfounded statement, but hilarious none the less. LMAO

  • 21 votes
#7.5 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:09 PM EST
professorwoland

both ACORN and SEIU are communist created organizations

Both were started by Social Democrats/Socialists.

  • 2 votes
#7.6 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:30 PM EST
David Boddie

Obama said himself, that he would consult with SEIU members before creating his Healthcare Reform. What are the people of this country that are anything other than liberals to think. First we have Van Jones, now the head of SEIU visiting the WH 23 times in 9 months. Why would we want a Healthcare bill that has any connections what-so-ever to do with a communisht organization?

Ummm... I think that a majority of health care workers (nurses, admin. assistants, etc) are unionized.

  • 10 votes
#7.7 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:35 PM EST
professorwoland

"Why would we want a healthcare bill that had any connections to healthcare workers!?"

  • 7 votes
#7.8 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:40 PM EST
njb

Oh fear the scoialists--which means we need to fire every teacher, fireman. police officer, animal control personnel, public works etc....oh those evil socialists...be afraid..very afraid.

Good grief....

  • 17 votes
#7.9 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:43 PM EST
fuhgetabotit

That's pretty funny but my favorite is...

both ACORN and SEIU are communist created organizations and what's worse, our president has been involved with these people since his college days

I mean, come on now, how much more ludicrous can anything be and still come from something with the ability to type a keyboard. Between this crap and the religious hysteria I honestly don't know what to say in reply.

Just keep typing kids, 20% and falling, pretty soon not even the average birther will be able to get in the ideological twilight zone you all have created for yourselves.

  • 10 votes
#7.10 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:48 PM EST
Bubba-939441

Any organization who is guilty of voter registration fraud (a felony) cannot be trusted. Donald Duck and Mickey Mouse were registered. They are being investigated in several states for voter fraud as well, but I don't believe the public is hearing the truth about these investigations. The big whigs in the Democratic do not want you to know ACORN is not a reputable organization.

    #7.11 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:19 PM EST
    David Boddie

    I believe that individual people are being investigated for voter registration fraud, not the organization, but I could be wrong. The reason a lot of this has come up is because the organization has to report system abuses (registration fraud) as required by law. So, they gave up their own employees. It's still pretty difficult to register 9 million ballots without someone finding out.

    Also, if you register 9 million ballots, you have to get someone to go vote as "Mickey Mouse" for it to count.

    • 8 votes
    #7.12 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:59 PM EST
    Buckeye Voter

    Any organization who is guilty of voter registration fraud (a felony) cannot be trusted. Donald Duck and Mickey Mouse were registered.

    Only someone who is abjectly ignorant of election law would fault an organization that promotes voter registration for the content of the forms submitted.

    That, and someone who wants to make a political point instead of an intelligent one.

    • 9 votes
    #7.13 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:21 PM EST
    webslinger

    Buckeye Voter, no matter how many times the difference is pointed out to Bubba he comes back with the same broken record.....He doesn't have an intelligent point because he doesn't want to HEAR or READ the facts - they interfere with what Beck tells him.

    • 11 votes
    #7.14 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:43 PM EST
    Bubba-939441

    All right Web, this doesn't come from Beck or a Republican, it comes from a Democrat who wants to investigate ACORN. Are you saying ACORN is innocent of all voter registration fraud?? Maybe you don't understand because it was never reported on MSNBC. They are under investigation in 12 states.

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/Examiner-Opinion-Zone/Rep-Conyers-Reverses-Stance-on-ACORN-Investigation--44485482.html

      #7.15 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:23 PM EST
      jmorris

      Bubba,

      That article was from last May. It has been six months now, where are all these "ïnvestigations" now? Where are the convictions? Who from ACORN's management is serving time? Hell who from ACORN's management is even charged with anything?

      I mean come on, over a dozen investigations and no one can find anything but some low level employees who tried to scam ACORN by padding Voter Registration cards?

      • 9 votes
      #7.16 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 6:03 AM EST
      bondibox

      For the umpteenth-thousandth time, registration fraud is not voter fraud!

      If bubba was doing voter registration and I signed a card saying I was Mickey Mouse - there is no voter fraud. I would have committed a misdemeanor, and if Bubba decides to purge my registration card, he's then committed a felony. None of Acorn's detractors have offered an alternative method to what they're claiming is corrupt, when there's actually no voter fraud going on. Read that again.

      Not. A. Single. Case. Of. Voter. Fraud.

      • 8 votes
      #7.17 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:35 AM EST
      Bubba-939441

      Isn't voter registration fraud a felony? Would you be so easy on them if this were a Republican organization using your tax dollar to register Mickey Mouse?

        #7.18 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:44 AM EST
        Buckeye Voter

        Interesting article by commentator Kevin Mooney. He starts with a non-story of voter fraud, then spends the rest of the article talking about an investigation of an embezzlement scheme. A non-careful reader would assume that the investigations discussed had something to do with voter fraud.

        But no, they don't.

        This, of course, isn't a news piece, but a political piece meant to misinform. But the sleight-of-hand makes it worth a read.

        • 5 votes
        #7.19 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:18 AM EST
        WmRAllen

        Both were started by Social Democrats/Socialists.

        Even if that's true, so what?

        • 3 votes
        #7.20 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:41 AM EST
        Scotty-1083859

        Buckeye Voter and other willfully blind liberals;

        You ask me to produce even just one proof of ACORN voter fraud. Here is one of my favorites; Milwaukee, Wisconsin. In 2005 a Joint Task Force was launched to investigate ACORN cheating. They reported the following;

        B. Summary of Findings
        Based on the investigation to date, the task force has found widespread record
        keeping failures and separate areas of voter fraud. These findings impact each other.
        Simply put: it is hard to prove a bank embezzlement if the bank cannot tell how much
        money was there in the first place. Without accurate records, the task force will have
        difficulty proving criminal conduct beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
        With that caveat, the task force has made the following specific determinations
        based on evidence examined to date:
        1. The task force has developed evidence of more than 100 individual
        instances of suspected double-voting, voting in names of persons who likely did not
        vote, and/or voting in names believed to be fake. Those investigations continue.
        2. In addition, the task force has determined that more than 200 felons voted
        when they were not eligible to do so. In order to establish criminal cases, the
        government must establish willful violations in individual instances.
        3. Also, the task force has found that persons who had been paid to register
        voters as "deputy registrars" falsely listed approximately 65 names in order to receive
        compensation for the registrations. The evidence does not indicate that these particular
        false registrations were later used to cast votes.
        4. The number of votes counted from the City of Milwaukee exceeds the
        number of persons recorded as voting by more than 4,500.

        I should also point out that voter registration fraud is vote fraud. Registration is where voting fraud begins. Once the phony registrations are logged with the elections office, that opens the door for the double voters to walk into the polling place and claim to be these falsely registered persons. You may remember this account which I copy here from Pajamas Media blog;

        In November 2006, 20,000 to 35,000 questionable voter registration forms were turned in by ACORN officials in Missouri. Most all of these were from St. Louis and Kansas City areas, where ACORN purportedly sought to help empower the "disenfranchised" minorities living there. But the ACORN workers weren't just told to register new voters. The workers admitted on camera that they were coached to tell registrants to vote for Democrat Claire McCaskill.

        In 2007, in Kansas City, Missouri, four ACORN employees were indicted for fraud. In April of this year eight ACORN employees in St. Louis city and county pleaded guilty to federal election fraud for submitting bogus voter registrations.

        I could go on and on, Buckeye Voter and other delusional lefties. You'd have to be living in a cave for the past year not to have noticed the pimp and prostitute videos that shook down ACORN through Andrew Brietbarts blogs. Are you really so ignorant, that you don't know this stuff? Or is living in a continual state of denial the only way you know?

        Get a clue, people. Watch Fox News once in awhile. There's a reason that Fox News attracts millions more viewers than MSNBC and CNN combined, you know. It's because facts are reported there.

        Okay, now I'd like to turn to the people who think it's important to point out that John McCain has ties to ACORN. Thank God in Heaven that he was not elected president last November. He lost because enough Republicans realized that he doesn't represent what they believe in. John McCain is a national hero for his service in the military. But as a senator, he is shameful. Who can doubt that his alignment with ACORN and SEIU pandering of the first order?
        The good news is that John McCain is being taken down a couple of notches by Sarah Palin's new book. Everyone, and I mean everyone named McCain should leave the Republican Party. They are losers.

        I'll just close by pointing out that the Democrats are in full panic mode now as they see the independents are running away from them in droves, Obama's approval ratings are dropping like a stone and even liberal Democrats are blaming Obama for the failure of the stimulus to turn the economy around.

        Enjoy!

          #7.21 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 4:47 PM EST
          Catch22

          I looked at the Milwakee report.

          Number of times ACORN was mentioned in the report: Zero
          Number of documeted cases of actual criminally fraudulent votes: Zero
          From the Milwaskee report on bogus voter registrations:

          There is no evidence
          gathered to date that votes were cast under these specific false names.

          They compared the names to voter roles and how many matched? Zero.

          We know that some ACORN staff submitted bogus registrations - why you say, to get paid.
          Is it illegal? Yes. Is it wrong? Yes. Should those who do it be punished? Yes.
          Is there evidence supporting a reasonable suspicion that ACORN had even the smallest chance of having been responsible for changing the outcome in the 2009 Presidential race: NO. Not even close. Is it rational to believe it anyway? No.

          You seem to assume that because ACORN has allegedly done bad things that is sufficient evidence to conclude that they changed the outcome of the 2008 election!?

          Probability that fraud altered the 2008 election by all causes: 0%
          Probility that ACORN changed the outcome of the 2008 Presidential election: 0.00%

          • 5 votes
          #7.22 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:09 PM EST
          webslinger

          Damn Catch22, you beat me to it....Apparently reading comprehension is not a skill taught anymore...thanks for the smackdown, sadly though it will not matter as Scotty will totally ignore it.

          • 4 votes
          #7.23 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:15 PM EST
          A. Macarthur

          Scotty in comment #7.21 made assertions about ACORN,

          Neither ACORN nor its employees have been found guilty of, or even charged with, casting fraudulent votes.

          There have been incidents of voter registration fraud.

          While ACORN canvassers have been found guilty of faking registration forms and others are being investigated the evidence that has surfaced so far shows they faked forms to get paid for work they didn't do, not to stuff ballot boxes.

          Actually, ACORN reported these faked registrations as they are, by law, required to do. By virtue of such reporting, the falsified registrations did not allow VOTES to be cast by fictitious voters.

          Ironically, THIS PREVENTED VOTER FRAUD!

          How about that.

          Voter registration fraud is WRONG; I'm a liberal democrat and I will repeat ... Voter registration fraud is UNLAWFUL and WRONG!

          Employers and other entities like ACORN, are subject to being compromised by incompetent and/or dishonest employees. It is one thing for ACORN as an organization to intentionally direct employees to commit acts of fraud, another to report employees who do so along with filing reports of their wrongful actions.

          From scotty's comment,

          1. The task force has developed evidence of more than 100 individual
          instances of suspected double-voting, voting in names of persons who likely did not
          vote, and/or voting in names believed to be fake. Those investigations continue.

          You will let us know the outcome , won't you scotty?

          scotty also wrote,

          I should also point out that voter registration fraud is vote fraud.

          And I should point out that this IS NOT TRUE! If the vote is never cast, no VOTE FRAUD HAS occurred.

          Now, let's get you straight, scotty, on real, big time voter fraud;

          Developed by political chief Karl Rove, the scheme (that led to the firing of Federal Attorney's by the Bush Administration) was evidently designed to advance his objective of discouraging minority and other voters with the bad habit of supporting Democrats. In Republican parlance, such attempts to hamper registration, intimidate citizens and reduce turnout in targeted communities are lauded as "combating voter fraud." Several of the fired U.S. attorneys had angered party operatives, including Rove, because they had shown so little enthusiasm for trumping up fraud cases against Democrats.

          But wait, there's more!

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0Fcv5uz_Ow

          And look, I'm a liberal (minded) guy, so, just as you ended your comment with the wish for me to ... "enjoy,"

          You do likewise.

          A. Macarthur

          • 8 votes
          #7.24 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:50 PM EST
          Scotty-1083859

          To all the fantasyland liberals.

          Well, it's not really even the least bit surprising that you folks can't see what is going on right before your eyes. Andrew Breitbart understand you people, too. That's why he's issued an ultimatum to Attorney General Holder to launch an investigation into ACORN or he will release more damning videos prior to the elections of next year.

          I imagine that Holder will continue to deny that investigation and make the same denials that you clueless fools make here. That's good. Keep on dreaming.

            #7.25 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:45 PM EST
            A. Macarthur

            scotty,

            Do you have the ability and information to rebut my points specifically.

            This doesn't say anything - it's not a rebuttal, it's a cop out

            it's not really even the least bit surprising that you folks can't see what is going on right before your eyes.

            Andrew Breitbart, your information go-to guy, is a commentator for the Washington Times, a Rev. Moon publication with total bias. He doesn't get to issue any ultimatum to an attorney general. Breitbart's background is the Drudge Report.

            Just take my comment (#7.24) and pick it apart, point-for-point. I gave actual, factual information and even pointed out where you gave absolutely WRONG information.

            You called me a "clueless fool" and gave me the sixth grader "Keep on dreaming" bull@!$%#, nothing-response.

            Come on ... debate me; don't give me the off-handed, know-nothing, right-wing, bumper sticker one-liners. Hit-and-run is not credible. Tell me exactly what I said in my comment that is not factual - then correct me. I stand by my comments - I always back them up, and, if/when I am wrong, I say so and apologize.

            That's what we "clueless fools" do; interestingly though, what you refer to as a "clueless fool," would be called by a person with integrity ... "a person who I don't agree with."

            So I challenge you ... what did I write that isn't factual ... then straighten me out.

            I can take it.

            A. Macarthur

            • 5 votes
            #7.26 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:18 PM EST
            Skye-768303

            I'm a Republican and I am very concerned about ACORN and the cheating that the Democrat Party does through it.

            Republicans go on and on about this kind of supposed fraud and never about white collar fraud such as Madoff, Enron, Worldcom, Adelphia, etc.

            • 7 votes
            #7.27 - Sat Nov 21, 2009 11:37 AM EST
            Lola-984242

            Or Halliburton and Blackwater.

            • 5 votes
            #7.28 - Sat Nov 21, 2009 11:57 AM EST
            Scotty-1083859

            A McArthur.
            Please go back and look at all the documentation that I have given and see that it is, in fact, specific and detailed.
            It is so thoroughly typical of you libraaaals to pretend that the facts do not apply when they are as plain and clear as the smashed bugs on your windshield.
            Simply denying that reality exists is not a valid defense. And yet, this is standard operating procedure for you guys.

            I find it hilarious that Brietbart's expose' of ACORN serves perfectly here as a model for your own behavior. James O'Keefe and Hanna Giles and Andrew Brietbart presented videos of ACORN's criminality for all the world to see with the first video. ACORN then found it a simple matter to merely deny that the video was indicative of any widespread activity at ACORN offices. So Brietbart released another couple of videos after the refutations. And then ACORN denied those. And then Breitbart released yet more videos and ACORN denied those.

            You flaming libraaaaaaaaaals are so predictable.

            Enjoy.

              #7.29 - Mon Nov 23, 2009 6:10 PM EST
              David Boddie

              These people are no better than Michael Moore, editing their footage to give a certain viewpoint. To them, public opinion is more important than legal investigations. People can call their Congressman and beg them to shut ACORN down, which is what happened in this case. If there were real illegal activity going on, did they submit all their footage to police? The FBI?

              I thought not.

              • 2 votes
              #7.30 - Mon Nov 23, 2009 7:26 PM EST
              A. Macarthur

              Please go back and look at all the documentation that I have given and see that it is, in fact, specific and detailed.

              Scotty,

              Your information is inaccurate - there were no substantiated case of voter fraud ... and you're still calling me names. If you can't debate without the child-like name calling, just back off.

              The videos were fabrications and/or set-ups.

              You wrote;

              Simply denying that reality exists is not a valid defense. And yet, this is standard operating procedure for you guys.

              Follow your own advice.

              And ...

              Tell all you right-wing hypocrites what I'll do. I will agree to an investigation regarding the stealing of the 2008 election by ACORN, if YOU WILL AGREE TO AN INVESTIGATION INTO ALLEGED WAR CRIMES AND VARIOUS CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS BY THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION.

              You in or out?

              A. Macarthur

              • 7 votes
              #7.31 - Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:00 PM EST
              bondibox

              Isn't voter registration fraud a felony?

              The crux of the issue, is WHO is committing the fraud? Was it ACORN themselves, a contracted employee, or just some guy off the street using their services? The wingnuts on this thread are equating what one random guy off the street does with the actions of corporate officers.

              And again, REGISTRATION FRAUD IS NOT VOTER FRAUD. A false registration has absolutely no connection, no causal connection to a fraudulently cast VOTE. The number of fraudulent votes cast? ZERO.

              Lastly, and I can't believe I'm actually spending the time to go over this point, Obama won the election by nearly 10 million votes. The total number of voters registered by ACORN was 2 million - and now I know math isn't your all's strongest subject but 2 million is less than 10 million. There's no way ... even if every single one of the voters that ACORN registered was an illegal mexican ... no way that ACORN could have "stolen" the election!!!!!

              • 7 votes
              #7.32 - Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:01 PM EST
              David Boddie

              Thanks, bondibox, I didn't know that ACORN has registered that many people... that's still an accomplishment!

              • 2 votes
              #7.33 - Mon Nov 23, 2009 11:55 PM EST
              Scotty-1083859

              A McArthur.

              Why I would waste my good time debating the likes of a person such as yourself, who cannot discern clear evidence that ACORN is a criminal organization, is beyond me.

              Hey McArthur; Bush has left office. He's not president anymore. Get over it. You're wasting your own precious time if you want to attack him while Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann are still politically active and are mortal threats to your criminal, socialist programs.

                #7.34 - Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:13 AM EST
                A. Macarthur

                Hey McArthur; Bush has left office. He's not president anymore.

                Oh, right, I forgot ... if someone committed crimes last Thursday and now it's next Wednesday, the crimes go away. Yeah, right, forgot.

                Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann are still politically active and are mortal threats to your criminal, socialist programs.

                You just became more frightening than you have been previously.

                Why I would waste my good time debating the likes of a person such as yourself, who cannot discern clear evidence that ACORN is a criminal organization, is beyond me.

                "The likes of a person such as myself?"

                Anyway, it seems a number of things are "beyond" you.

                A. Macarthur

                • 6 votes
                #7.35 - Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:49 AM EST
                fuhgetabotit

                There ya go,a frustrated rightie winger who can't seem to remove head from misinformation trots out one foxlingual after another and when the reasoning world says pffft, whats this stupid sheet, and how can anyone hoover this kind of stuff from the GOP's pant leg and the rear end of a Fox and then expect others to believe it? They get all personal and start with the Palin is God and you are a socialist, socialist, socialist BOO! if you don't bow to the crippled poisoned ideology of the right.

                The right in America, the right on the blogs, and what it has become. The bottom half of the tea pot and a waste of Americas time and energy.

                Not to pile on, but A Mac has it right and the other stuff, it shouldn't convince a 10 year old its such obvious malarkey, but then hey, that's the right for you, quality last, first to talk, last to think.

                Ignorance has a Political Party, stupidity has a savior, wretched church crazy has a home, Americas right has found its High priestess and her name, for now, is Palin.

                This is who you are arguing with, this is the right in America and on the blogs.

                one, two, three, four

                Nice stuff ain't it?

                • 5 votes
                #7.36 - Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:58 AM EST
                Reply
                demo scout

                It is one thing to believe that Bush stole an election he only won by a few votes. But it is sheer stupidity to believe that Obama won by 9 million votes because of massive fraud by Acorn. It didn't happen and there is no evidence that it did. Even the worst annecdotal evidence about Acorn's alleged voter fraud would involve only a handful of votes, not millions.

                • 24 votes
                Reply#8 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:19 PM EST
                Buckeye Voter

                It is one thing to believe that Bush stole an election he only won by a few votes.

                In 2000, it wasn't even that. Bush lost the popular vote.

                • 21 votes
                #8.1 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:25 PM EST
                JoMan

                In 2000, it wasn't even that. Bush lost the popular vote.

                That should have been it right there. Should have been the end to the electoral vote. One person One voice Once vote. Where the hell is my barricade?

                • 7 votes
                #8.2 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:41 PM EST
                evilgenius

                That should have been it right there. Should have been the end to the electoral vote. One person One voice Once vote.

                I hope to hell I never see that happen. You would then only see campaigning in populous places. Rural states/districts must get a say in what goes on in our government too.

                • 3 votes
                #8.3 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:08 PM EST
                agio

                Getting rid of the electoral college in favor of direct elections is a complicated question. I think I would prefer to see some kind of reform of the college, but not its complete removal.

                • 4 votes
                #8.4 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:31 PM EST
                JoMan

                You would then only see campaigning in populous places.

                I live on the west coast - we never see the candidates - maybe on a fly over. But the electoral vote has done nothing for us.

                As far as I can tell all we need to have a president elected into office is Ohio, maybe Florida for safe measure. So why they heck have county wide election to begin with?

                All I can say is thank heaven for the west side of my state.

                • 3 votes
                #8.5 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:43 PM EST
                Buckeye Voter

                Rural states/districts must get a say in what goes on in our government too.

                But do people vote, or dirt? Why should people with more dirt between them have a vote that counts for more than someone with less dirt?

                • 4 votes
                #8.6 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:18 PM EST
                Reply
                paul-662506

                Scotty and Rita. Thank you for that. I'd love to know more. Please post for us your documentation. Thank you!

                • 9 votes
                Reply#9 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:23 PM EST
                trm2008

                I would love to see it too.

                • 9 votes
                #9.1 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:10 PM EST
                Allegory

                I'd like to see it as well, but I will not consider Youtube as a source before you bother.

                • 6 votes
                #9.2 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:49 PM EST
                trm2008

                Is Glenn Beck a valid source?

                • 3 votes
                #9.3 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:03 PM EST
                fuhgetabotit

                Hey now, I love sourcing u-tube, a video has to be worth a million pictures and so on...

                Lets face it, as much eloquence as we try and pour out describing what a bunch of @!$%# headed, ignorant, religiously delusional and gullible, white trash makes up the 'r'ight in this country, nothing beats a video now does it?

                • 4 votes
                #9.4 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:01 PM EST
                Allegory

                @ fuhgetabotit

                Youtube is great for jest and making points and other similar things. The website as a whole has changed our world and I think it's fantastic.

                That said, there are zero videos on that website that will count as proof of acorn stealing the election.

                • 4 votes
                #9.5 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:56 PM EST
                fuhgetabotit

                Ohh, well as long as I get to keep using some of my favorites, I mean, imagine how much typing it would take to say what's in some of those...pheww, exhausting, so ok then ;)

                • 2 votes
                #9.6 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:54 PM EST
                Reply
                demo scout

                A huge portion of this anger must be related to race. Acorn is seen as a black group that stole the election for a black candidate. If anyone has the cojones they should design a poll among the Republicans to test that hypothesis. It would be very helpful to know if racism is the real core problem.

                • 16 votes
                Reply#10 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:28 PM EST
                WmRAllen

                Might be interesting, but it would never work. On the one hand, most people would not admit to holding racist beliefs since it's no longer culturally acceptable...

                On the other hand, we're all familiar with the kinds of rationalizations and apologetics (and in many cases, simple lack of self-knowledge) that pop up constantly to try to shift any argument about race away from that subject and on to something else. Been going on in this country since the old "state's rights" argument for secession in the 1860s, and doesn't show any signs of changing...

                • 1 vote
                #10.1 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:51 AM EST
                Reply
                Clive's StaplesDeleted
                ScienceGuy-356641

                The main contention of the right wing naysayers is that there were some irregularities in voter registrations gathered by ACORN employees. No argument here.

                But registrations do not equal votes. There is NO evidence whatsoever that any invalid registrations led to invalid voting. None. Zero.

                But then, right wingers rarely let reality get in the way of their rhetoric (or their delusions).

                • 16 votes
                Reply#12 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:18 PM EST
                webslinger

                Also, when asked, how many polled didn't have a clue what ACORN did?

                Also, when asked where they first heard of ACORN, how many said "Glenn Beck"?

                Also, when asked, how many could explain the difference between VOTER FRAUD and VOTER REGISTRATION FRAUD?

                • 16 votes
                Reply#13 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:18 PM EST
                Pacific Northwest Blogger

                There's so many ways to look at this statement

                I'll stick with "people different from them stole the election"

                This is a result of the decades of divisional conditioning that went in to high gear during Tom Delay's reign, followed on and continued by Newt Gingrich and now taken up by the likes of Karl Rove, William Krystal and the group of neo-cons that altered the face of the republican party, to become the ultra social conservative extremist cult it is today. (my apologies to old school limited government fiscally responsible conservatives - I miss you guys...)

                • 12 votes
                Reply#14 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:20 PM EST
                agio

                I agree. I am also guessing that this result reflects a shrinking of the absolute number of people who self-identify as Republican, to the point that fringe beliefs such as this come to dominate.

                • 5 votes
                #14.1 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:29 PM EST
                Reply
                Obamarunswithscissors

                I bet these same Republicans say Bush didn't steal the Presidency even though Gore won the popular vote by a larger number than all of their tea bagger marches combined...Yes these are exaggerations to make their lives livable.....

                • 8 votes
                Reply#15 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:31 PM EST
                Luke Wright

                I bet these same Republicans say Bush didn't steal the Presidency even though Gore won the popular vote by a larger number than all of their tea bagger marches combined

                I'll bet those same republicans are all smart enough to know that we don't elect Presidents by popular vote. It's done by the electoral college. Gore could've won the popular vote by 20 million votes and still lost the election! That's how it works so that the wackos who live in the huge cities like New York and Los Angeles don't dictate to the rest of us how the entire country should be run!

                • 2 votes
                #15.1 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:37 PM EST
                Louie Lou

                Well, we'll never know who won the electoral vote in 2000.

                • 5 votes
                #15.2 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:56 PM EST
                webslinger

                Regardless of whether we will ever know who "won", we know who was RIGHT and who made the wrong choice....There's little vindication in saying "I told ya so" though.

                • 1 vote
                #15.3 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:02 PM EST
                Luke Wright

                Well, we'll never know who won the electoral vote in 2000.

                Wow...just what we need...another "George Bush Birther"...inconcievable!!!

                • 1 vote
                #15.4 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:09 PM EST
                Louie Lou

                Wow...just what we need...another "George Bush Birther"...inconcievable!!!

                I don't rely on theories if that's what you're getting at, Luke. There were votes that were never counted back in 2000. That's a fact!

                • 6 votes
                #15.5 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:21 PM EST
                Luke Wright

                . There were votes that were never counted back in 2000. That's a fact!

                The only votes that I can remember not being counted were the thousands of military overseas votes that Al Gore got thrown out of the count. Is that the votes you are referring to? As we all know several liberal newspapers recounted all of the votes in the Florida election and Al Gore never once got enough votes to win! Liberals cry about republicans being sore losers in the last election, but still can't bring themselves to say GEORGE BUSH WON IN 2000!!!

                • 2 votes
                #15.6 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:41 PM EST
                agio

                George Bush won in 2000, much to the lasting shame of our country. There, now can we move on?

                • 7 votes
                #15.7 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:43 PM EST
                Luke Wright

                George Bush won in 2000, much to the lasting shame of our country. There, now can we move on?

                I don't know...can we Louie?

                • 1 vote
                #15.8 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:44 PM EST
                C123456789Deleted
                C123456789Deleted
                agio

                I mean, whether or not Gore would have won if the SCOTUS had not intervened is irrelevant, and generally a waste of time to argue about.

                • 4 votes
                #15.11 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:03 PM EST
                C123456789Deleted
                Louie Lou

                I don't know...can we Louie?

                I did. Can Repubs let go of last year?

                • 6 votes
                #15.13 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:21 PM EST
                Reply
                DaVinci-984257

                Among Republicans, however, only 27% say Obama actually won the race, with 52% -- an outright majority -- saying that ACORN stole it,

                This is also the party that has Palin and Bachmann as its "prominent" spokeswomen; the party that believes in the fairytale of Adam & Eve; the party that thinks Creationism aka Intelligent Design, should be taught in schools as a "balance" to the "flawed" Theory of Evolution; the party that fought stem cell research; the party which believes that if you deregulate the market all things bright and beautiful will happen and we'll all live happily ever after; the party which believes that if we concentrate wealth in the hands of the rich, the rest of us will all get wealthy when that wealth "trickles" down!

                • 11 votes
                Reply#16 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:32 PM EST
                servus_aus_tex

                It really is amazing. I think in the South especially, the Republicans/conservatives think no white people voted for Obama. I know those conservatives(Bushies) in my family, many of them think no or very few whites voted for Obama. They think Acorn did it all through voter fraud. This view(stupid as it is) must be fairly wide-spread, because the Republicans have set out to destroy the whole Acorn organization ever since Obama won.

                • 8 votes
                Reply#17 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:01 PM EST
                servus_aus_tex

                The Republicans have no evidence on lots of things. They just make accusations and insinuations, espouse a bunch of rhetoric, propaganda, fearmongering, and incite violence.

                Remember when Dick Cheney went on the war path against Nancy Pelosi about she knew this and she knew that from/about the CIA, and she was lying and covering up what she had been told, blah blah blah. No evidence. That's why nothing was done and Cheney had to shut up. No evidence, just "I wish it were so" on the part of conservatives, so "let's tell a lie over and over and over for long enough and maybe people will believe it".

                Just look at all the accusations and labels about Obama. No evidence. He was brainwashing the school children. He is a secret Muslim terrorist. He is not really an American - his birth certificate is a fake. He's going to cut off Granny.

                All the crap about massive fraud by Acorn is just more of the Glenn Becks and Rush Limbaughs of America feeding the haters and bigots and rednecks, otherwise known as Republican conservatives and fundamentalist christians, what they want to hear.

                • 6 votes
                Reply#18 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:51 PM EST
                TheSkeptic-1418965Deleted
                agio

                that Jeb Bush and his attorney general "stole" the election for Bush, I'd say.

                Alright, while I'm really not a fan of reopening this can of worms, let me just point out:

                2000 election: Bush's margin of victory in the popular vote = -500,000
                2008 election: Obama's margin of victory in the popular vote = 9.5 million

                Even though I find arguments about 2000 to be fruitless, I have to say it's at least feasible that it could have been stolen. Comparing the two is a false equivalence.

                • 6 votes
                #18.2 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 6:16 PM EST
                fuhgetabotit

                Besides, the GOP isn't complaining about it, in those circles stealing an election is a good thing, something to be proud of, something the good old boys give ya a wink and a nod for, which is why they probably did steal it but no one is bothering to say much about it as it makes the likes of Rove and Cheney proud and happy which is almost worse then the actual theft.

                You know how it is, anything can be justified in the lords service or in protecting America for the chosen leadership.

                • 2 votes
                #18.3 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:01 PM EST
                Reply
                C123456789Deleted
                Texasguy01

                I would also count John McCain, the worst Presidential candidate ever as a factor. A weak, stupid and confused campaign. Republicans had no issues, attitudes or plans. The only plan appeared to be steamrolled. And still it was only a few points

                • 5 votes
                Reply#20 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:58 PM EST
                RI Mom

                Ask McCain about the last election...he should know what really happened.

                • 2 votes
                Reply#21 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:06 PM EST
                grouse14Deleted
                Bubba-939441

                McCain is far too liberal for the Republican party. Dems won because they turned out. The Repubs will need to find more conservative candidates or their base will stay home again in 2012, although it may not matter who they run as Mr Obama's numbers are rapidly declining.

                  Reply#23 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:23 PM EST
                  jmorris

                  Hey Bubba,

                  Do you have any fears that the Republican party will choose a "too Conservative" candidate that appeals to the base but drives away independents and moderates?

                  Do you think the GOP can win a general election with only it's 25% base?

                  • 5 votes
                  #23.1 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 6:11 AM EST
                  jawill11

                  McCain is far too liberal for the Republican party. Dems won because they turned out.

                  While it's true that Dems won because they turned out, it's not true that Republicans lost because they didn't turn out for McCain.

                  It's fairly easy to look at the numbers and see if that's true or not. In 2004, Republicans made up 30% of 122 million voters, or 36.6 million. In 2008, Republicans made up 28.7% of 131 million voters, or 37.6 million.

                  So, in reality, a million more Republican voters turned out in 2008 than in 2004.

                  • 3 votes
                  #23.2 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:11 AM EST
                  Reply
                  Hayduke1

                  The poll should surprise no one. After all, the vast majority of the GOP think FOX is an actual news channel.

                  http://mrchollyhudnall.newsvine.com/_news/2009/11/18/3517267-fox-news-runs-old-palin-campaign-footage-reports-it-as-book-signing-crowds

                  • 6 votes
                  Reply#24 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:57 PM EST
                  dizzy1

                  You should smart up man. If you are implying that MSNBC IS a news channel, you are a lost cause

                    #24.1 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:11 PM EST
                    Hayduke1

                    No, I'm not implying that. But at least I'm comfortable saying MSNBC is biased, whereas conservatives really beleive Fox noise is 'fair and balanced."

                    • 5 votes
                    #24.2 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:36 PM EST
                    dizzy1

                    So you are saying that conservatives are not able to see bias and liberals are?Don't fool yourself. Conservatives are smart enough to know when a reporter is showing bias. They watch Fox because Fox is the lesser of the two evils. MSNBC is way over the top and you CANT deny that. I can't beleive they are still on the air!

                      #24.3 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:01 PM EST
                      Reply
                      Offshore43

                      McCain by himself forced people that would have voted republican to either not vote or vote for somebody else, coupled along with his running mate choice, coupled along with the state of the country , coupled along with the democrats bussing everyone they could find to the polls gave the vitory to Obama. I don't actually think he won, he just did not lose!

                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#25 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 6:35 PM EST
                      steven-791492

                      I always find this claim so far off base, I have worked as a poll worker on the precinct level. At no time am I alone to pass a questionable voter threw, there is an opposing Party judge watching every move I make checking identification or I am watching them.

                      Admittedly there were lots of registration applications that were just plain wrong, on Both sides. That is light years away from un-qualified voter getting onto the roles to actually vote. Again the vetting process is done with a Democrat and a Republican judge watching every move.

                      • 5 votes
                      Reply#26 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 6:51 PM EST
                      dizzy1

                      Snap out of it you people! This is not a game! there are serious things that are happening here. We all are at risk of losing a lot of our individual rights. Having fun with politics right now is not what we need! Are any of you paying attention.

                        Reply#27 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:08 PM EST
                        Lola-984242

                        Dizzy1, you sound like me after the 2000 election.

                        • 6 votes
                        #27.1 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:11 PM EST
                        C123456789Deleted
                        dizzy1

                        Perfect examples of what I am talking about. This has nothing to do with GW,republican,democrat. ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION??! Bad bad things are happening to our country right now! Wake up! stop the fun little shots just for a while, and really consider what is going on. I won't ha ha you if you change your mind. It is what ADULTS do.

                          #27.3 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:13 PM EST
                          C123456789Deleted
                          FrJackHackett

                          This has nothing to do with GW,republican,democrat.

                          It has everything to do with Bush and the damage he caused and the people like dizzy who voted him in to do it. They had their chance in 2004 when it was obvious Bush wasn't equal to the task of being president and they helped to put him in yet again.

                          • 2 votes
                          #27.5 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:47 PM EST
                          dizzy1

                          Mr Hackett How does any of what is going on right now have anything to do with GW? Not talking about the wars, Obama is obviously not interested in the wars. Can't you see the the course he is setting? Nationalized health care is the start. When the government starts telling us how we will live our private lives, it's all over, and fast. I like Bryers Ice cream, Soon it will be a elite idea to eat bryers,because if the poor among us can't afford Bryers,(only store brand for them) Then I must be punished, therefore a luxury tax on Bryers. Next,my home, my car, Brand of toothpaste. If the poor can't aford what I enjoy, I must pay a penance for my sins(hard work). It will show up on your doorstep one day and if you don't see it now to stop it, it will be a rolling snow ball too big to stop.

                            #27.6 - Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:18 PM EST
                            fuhgetabotit

                            lol, ya teapots whistling there, ;);)

                            • 3 votes
                            #27.7 - Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:26 PM EST
                            Reply
                            servus_aus_tex

                            Bubba....McCain is far too liberal for the Republican party. Dems won because they turned out. The Repubs will need to find more conservative candidates or their base will stay home again in 2012, although it may not matter who they run as Mr Obama's numbers are rapidly declining.

                            LOL. Apparently the Bubbas haven't figured it out yet. The majority of America are not far-right conservatives. So Republicans putting the most conservative person they can find out there, will result in even FEWER votes for the Republican candidate.

                            The "base" of the Republican party is now a fringe group of fanatical, radical people. The Republican "base" is not going to win an election on it's own. And that's a good thing.

                            • 8 votes
                            Reply#28 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:45 PM EST
                            fuhgetabotit

                            The All American Bubba, first to speak, last to know...

                            • 5 votes
                            #28.1 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:07 PM EST
                            Bubba-939441

                            Voters say the country is heading in the wrong direction. Campaign promises are not being kept and this administration is a bunch of thieves and tax cheaters. Will it be bad enough to vote Republican in 2012? After 4yrs of Mr Obama perhaps some of the conservative voters who stayed home last time will turn out, perhaps some of the independents will have buyer's remorse. I know you libs want another 4yrs but it ain't in the cards.

                              #28.2 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:53 PM EST
                              fuhgetabotit

                              Well hell boy, I'm a conservative republican that was out there voting this last election, right here in Georgia in fact, heart of the bible belt and the South both. Red state bub. My man for president did just fine, what happened, you vote for the loser and the stupid twit or something? Can you vote? Just asking, your education strikes me as government provided, like a prison school or something lacking in the humanities and heavy on abuse.

                              Anyway, I couldn't take the smell coming from the GOP this last time out. Not after two failed wars, financial collapse, not so much as an 'oops our bad' and the fact that after all the money death and war the one skinny arab I thought we should have killed is still laughing from pool side in our good allies country...

                              But thats just me, that stuff bugged me. And church crazy stupid ignorance gives me a rash, that didn't help.

                              • 7 votes
                              #28.3 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:08 PM EST
                              Reply
                              dizzy1

                              The "base" of the Republican party is now a fringe group of fanatical, radical people.

                              Amazing! just amazing. You have that to say about the republican party when the democrats are just way over the top. Bold face lies,socialist ideas,marxism,radical redistrubution of wealth ideas,TAX TAX TAX,. Republicans can see what is going on and are not liking it. They see the threat. They aren't radical, they are mad to think that our government seems to have forgotten who they work for, not to mention they are sworn to PROTECT the constitution, not rewrite it

                              • 1 vote
                              Reply#29 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:19 PM EST
                              Al 616

                              dizzy1,

                              How do you propose that we lower the national debt without some taxation?

                              The only thing I would suggest is that America has to focus on industry and start exporting goods on a mass scale again. The super-rich had their chance to re-invest in America after Mr. Ronald St. Reagan lowered their taxes back in the 1980s.

                              The super-rich (Mr. St. Reagan and his "friends") didn't. They didn't "trickle down" anything. Instead, after de-regulation of businesses and bank policies, they exported jobs and business and did not reinvest in America. And, they dismantled much of America's industrial infrastructure in the process. To make up for it, Mr. St. Reagan introduced "deficit spending" and started borrowing against Social Security as collatoral.

                              Now we have 30 years of debt. Anyone who thinks that any of it is going to be paid off or paid down without some taxation is in a fantasy world.

                              • 9 votes
                              #29.1 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:15 PM EST
                              Bubba-939441

                              "The super-rich (Mr. St. Reagan and his "friends") didn't"trickle down anything"

                              Isn't Mr Obama a multi-millionaire?? So is Charlie Rangel. Have they trickled any down?? Our tax money trickles up to Charlie everytime he forgets how many rent houses he has when calculating his taxes.

                              • 1 vote
                              #29.2 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:03 PM EST
                              jawill11

                              Isn't Mr Obama a multi-millionaire?? So is Charlie Rangel.

                              And those millionaires are proposing higher taxes on themselves. I guess they are trying to trickle down in the realistic way: through taxation.

                              • 5 votes
                              #29.3 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:17 AM EST
                              Bubba-939441

                              Taxation?? Wasn't Rangel cheating on his taxes to pay less not more?? He votes himself an increase then cheats on his taxes to get it back. It ain't tricklin nowwhere but his pocket!!

                                #29.4 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:40 PM EST
                                jawill11

                                I don't know what Rangle was doing on his taxes. I would prefer if the IRS took a closer look at all tax returns at the top brackets. For many years now, they audited lower income people at a far higher percentage than high income people, and we both know which bracket is more likely to cheat with much higher stakes.

                                The point is that rich Dems are willing to raise taxes on their own bracket. Rich Republicans won't do it and don't tell me with a straight face that they don't also play games on their tax returns.

                                • 3 votes
                                #29.5 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 6:19 PM EST
                                dizzy1

                                AL 616 Please read the response you wrote to me. Study it, when you fully understand what is so very wrong, yet obvious with it, you will instantly change your perspective. I promise you will. ( hint: two words,first sentence)

                                  #29.6 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:27 PM EST
                                  servus_aus_tex

                                  AL616, I guess you still believe in trickle-down economics? LOL Bush and the Republicans borrowed and spent more than any other administration in the history of America to pay for their little BS war in Iraq based on lies about weapons of mass destruction.

                                  Oh yes by all means. Let's just cut taxes to the rich and corporate America some more. Maybe some crumbs will trickle down before we all starve to death. What has trickle-down economics done over the last 30 years? The rich have gotten richer, the middle-class has been destroyed, and the poor have gotten poorer.

                                  Trickle-down. Anyone with HALF a brain knows that money flows from the bottom UP, not from the top DOWN. But that's okay, let's keep villifying labor and workers unions and rights, and benefits, and keep giving the rich more tax cuts, and keep paying huge, outrageous salaries to the CEOs, so the stockholders will be happy, because after all no one else matters. Let the workers get poorer and poorer and the CEOs get richer and richer. See where it gets us in the end.

                                  • 3 votes
                                  #29.7 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 10:55 PM EST
                                  dizzy1

                                  Are you really that dumb? Don't you get the basics of how a stable economy works?

                                    #29.8 - Sat Nov 21, 2009 6:50 PM EST
                                    Reply
                                    Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                    Leave a Comment:
                                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                    Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                    FUN STUFF:
                                    • Leaderboard |
                                    • E-Mail Alerts |
                                    • Top of the Vine |
                                    • Newsvine Live |
                                    • Newsvine Archives |
                                    • The Greenhouse |
                                    COMPANY STUFF:
                                    • Code of Honor |
                                    • Company Info |
                                    • Contact Us |
                                    • Jobs |
                                    • User Agreement |
                                    • Privacy Policy |
                                    • About our ads
                                    LEGAL STUFF:
                                    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com